The Development of Peer Review – Discuss Dentistry https://demo.discussdentistry.com/forums/topic/the-development-of-peer-review/feed/ Thu, 15 Jan 2026 06:17:37 +0000 https://bbpress.org/?v=2.6.12 en-US https://demo.discussdentistry.com/forums/topic/the-development-of-peer-review/#post-14362 <![CDATA[Re: The Development of Peer Review]]> https://demo.discussdentistry.com/forums/topic/the-development-of-peer-review/#post-14362 Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:00:57 +0000 good information. any journal which is peer reviewed is of a high quality.

veeren

        

]]> https://demo.discussdentistry.com/forums/topic/the-development-of-peer-review/#post-14363 <![CDATA[Re: The Development of Peer Review]]> https://demo.discussdentistry.com/forums/topic/the-development-of-peer-review/#post-14363 Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:23:10 +0000 sushantpatel_doc In one of the most recent surveys, dentists were asked if they have been disappointed by dental peer review. Respondents were split on the issue; 47% reported having problems, while the remaining 53% had no issues with dental boards. “I think it is a fair process to both the patient and the dentist,” commented one dentist. Another disagreed, saying, “The dentist is assumed guilty; it’s a witch hunt even if you are innocent.”

Specialists were significantly less likely than general dentists to have had trouble with dental board peer review. Though half of general dentists (51%) reported problems, only 14% of specialists did.

Geographical location was not highly correlated with results. However, urban dentists were the most likely to complain about dental peer review.

        

]]>