study the use of simple and effective methods for the treatment of mandibular fractures.

Home Forums Oral & Maxillofacial surgery study the use of simple and effective methods for the treatment of mandibular fractures.

Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #15358
    Drsumitra
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/10/2011
    Topics: 238
    Replies: 542
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    With increasing mandibular atrophy, the physical size of the mandible decreases. In the severely atrophic mandible, even very minor trauma can cause fracture. Additionally, pathologic fracture during mastication can occur. Very often, due to the fragile nature of the jaw, these fractures occur bilaterally.
    Orthopantomogram (OPG), mandible series radiograph and CT scans can be used to diagnose and plan the treatment of the atrophic edentulous mandible fractures.

     

     

    Axial CT scan showing bilateral fractures.
    Note that although there appears to be a large bone stock, this patient’s mandible has only approximately 7 mm of vertical height.

    Observation and soft diet

    Observation may be indicated for patients medically unfit for general anesthesia. Atrophic edentulous mandible fracture patients are often elderly with medical problems presenting severe anesthetic risks.
    One major complication of observation and soft diet would be nonunion of the mandibular fracture.

    Closed reduction

    Historically, atrophic edentulous fractures were treated closed by wiring in the patients dentures or fabricating Gunning style splints with postoperative mandibulomaxillary fixation (MMF).
    Standard treatment with closed reduction often resulted in prolonged periods of MMF which was difficult for these patients. Additionally, the fractures were often poorly aligned. Postoperative malunions and nonunions were very common
    ORIF

    Indications for ORIF are any displaced atrophic mandible fracture requiring surgical intervention.
    Following the AO principles of anatomic reduction of fractures and immediate function, ORIF of atrophic edentulous mandible fractures with load-bearing osteosynthesis has a distinct advantage for these patients. The technique has evolved to provide the patient with an excellent chance for mandibular union while the ability to masticate is preserved.
    Literature has supported the efficacy of this technique.

    enlarge
    External fixation

    Indications of external fixator might be the temporary stabilization of a fracture while the patient is treated medically, or if soft-tissue maturation around the fracture site is required.

    enlarge
    Complications,including malunion and nonunion are significant when external fixators are used as they do not provide absolute stability at the fracture site.
    3 Treatment of an edentulous atrophic fracture with a reconstruction plate

    enlarge
    In the following, the treatment of an edentulous atrophic fracture with a reconstruction plate is described step-by-step.
    4 Approach

    enlarge
    Extraoral appraoch

    When treating atrophic edentulous mandible fractures, the surgeon will generally find it easier to use an extraoral surgical approach. The fracture fragments can be manipulated under direct visualization and stabilized while the reconstruction plate is being bent and applied to the mandible.

    enlarge
    Intraoral approach

    An intraoral approach is possible but technically more difficult as the surgeon will need several sets of trained hands just to retract the soft tissues of the cheeks and tongue. Additionally, stabilization and fixation of the fractures is much more difficult via an intraoral approach. One should also be aware that the inferior alveolar nerve is located on the superior surface of the atrophic mandible. Therefore one must be extremely careful making intraoral incisions to expose atrophic fractures, or the nerve can be damaged.

     

    #15359
    Drsumitra
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/10/2011
    Topics: 238
    Replies: 542
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    Disruption of the endosteal and periosteal blood supply occurs with the initial trauma, and maintaining adequate blood supply to the fracture site is essential for healing. Hunter described the 4 classic stages of natural bone repair: inflammation, soft callus, hard callus, and remodeling. The inflammation stage begins soon after injury and appears clinically as swelling, pain, erythema, and heat. Disrupted local vascular supply at the injured site creates a hematoma and prompts the migration of inflammatory cells, which stimulate angiogenesis and cell proliferation. After the initial inflammatory phase, the soft callus stage begins with an infiltration of fibrous tissue and chondroblasts surrounding the fracture site. The replacement of hematoma by this structural network adds stability to the fracture site.

    Soft callus is then converted into rigid bone, the hard callus stage, by enchondral ossification and intramembranous bone formation. Once the fracture has united, the process of remodeling begins. Fibrous bone is eventually replaced by lamellar bone. Although this process has been called secondary bone union or indirect fracture repair, it is the natural and expected way fractures heal. Fractures with less than an anatomic reduction and less rigid fixation (ie, those with large gaps and low strain via external fixator, casting, and intramedullary [IM] nailing) heal with callous formation or secondary healing with progression through several different tissue types and eventual remodeling.

    Anatomic reduction and absolute stabilization of a fracture by internal fixation alter the biology of fracture healing by diminishing strain (elongation force) on the healing tissue at the fracture site. Absolute stability with no fracture gap (eg, via ORIF using interfragmental compression and plating) presents a low strain and results in primary healing (cutting cone) without the production of callus. In this model, cutter heads of the osteons reach the fracture and cross it where bone-to-bone contact exists. This produces union by interdigitation of these newly formed osteons bridging the gap. The small gaps between fragments fill with membranous bone, which remodels into cortical bone as long as the strain applied to these tissues does not cause excessive disruption and fibrous tissue develops (nonunion). This method of bone healing is known as direct bone healing or primary bone union. Essentially, the process of bone remodeling allows bone to respond to the stresses to which it is exposed.

    Based on the mechanical milieu of the fracture as dictated by the surgeon’s choice of internal fixation and the fracture pattern, 2 patterns of stability can result that determine the type of bone healing that will occur. Absolute stability (ie, no motion between fracture fragments) results in direct or primary bone healing (remodeling). Relative stability (ie, a certain amount of fragment motion) heals with secondary or indirect bone union.

     

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.